My say.....
Inland Revenue Board (IRB) in Malaysia has a reputation ill-earned. it was previously seen as a government monolith with frightening legal power at its disposal. By power, it has the means to fine massive monetary penalties or get offenders in jail. Businessmen and corporations alike who default wouldn't want to entangle this particular agency. Pay up or pay the piper, someone once quipped! hence its ill-earned reputation in its chief responsibility to fill the Government's coffer.
In today's The Star "Focus" pull-out report, it is discouraging to note in the article when paying tax can be such a harrowing experience for many. top of list of the complaints certainly stems from wrong information especially when in official letterheads issued from a particular department of the IRB. one highlighted, a particular Mazirah, who received three certificates of tax clearance upon her retirement and later received a surprise notice to pay up again. Another complain was IRB issue official letters stating one thing and their own officials states another upon clarification. This is stressful for many law-abiding citizens who normally takes time off and leave from their work in sought of clarification. whilst the article have the CEO and director-general explained about the processing aspects and the delay causes, it is still an issue that IRB needs to solve, not the taxpayers!
The point to be raised is the issuance of official documents and letters. I believe that its a duty for all governmental departments and agencies to be careful with such issue. for when an official letter is issued, i believe it should be accountable for its content. for in many cases, it entails a warning that a fine or imprisonment could be initiated in the failure to comply to its details. My point is, if a legal letter such as this is being issued, then it must be made legally binding to for IRB as well. If it can drag people to court, it must be made liable likewise in the event of their error. that should be the rule of law in the name of fairness.
On a brighter note, IRB has improved a lot. An E-filing system is in place making it easier for individuals and corporations alike to file their tax returns. This is a good start in the name of efficiency. it has embarked on a people-friendly approach too lately. Taxpayers nowadays are allowed for installments settlement upon request. Refunds are speedier too today. this friendlier approach by IRB has been widely practised since Hasmah Abdullah held the helm from my observation. What i like about her is her in-depth and hands-on approach. The best part is her ability to provide answers in time frame context. Seriously, how many Director-Generals speak in this manner and with the confidence she does? I think the official letters issues or other complaints will be resolved soon with capable people such as her in charge. All credit to Hasmah Abdullah.
Sunday, March 30, 2008
On the Beat dated 30th March 2008
My say....
I read with gratification about Wong Chun Wai's call for the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) to be answerable only to Parliament. He is the current Group editor for the Star Newspaper. This has been stated before in my previous post in my call to have transparency and accountability of all in the ruling as well as opposition parties and especially government agencies. ACA needs to be away from the purview of the Prime Minister's office if it is to gain back its respect.There should be no let up in the awakened call of the rakyat against corruption.
This is away from his normal pro-government statements expected of Wong, who is working for a government controlled press media. Let the voice of conscience be heard again please.
I read with gratification about Wong Chun Wai's call for the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) to be answerable only to Parliament. He is the current Group editor for the Star Newspaper. This has been stated before in my previous post in my call to have transparency and accountability of all in the ruling as well as opposition parties and especially government agencies. ACA needs to be away from the purview of the Prime Minister's office if it is to gain back its respect.There should be no let up in the awakened call of the rakyat against corruption.
This is away from his normal pro-government statements expected of Wong, who is working for a government controlled press media. Let the voice of conscience be heard again please.
Thursday, March 27, 2008
A new political dawn....
My say.....
The recent case with the new Menteri Besar (Chief Minister) of Terengganu was a real eye opener. Idris Jusoh, the former incumbent MB has won his state seat in the election. He was considered a shoo-in to retain his post then. But he has fell out of favor with both palace officials and the Sultan, also the current Constitutional King of Malaysia, on grounds that he has been rude and his followers disrespectful.
So this just added to Pak Lah's dilemma as he has already issued the letter of appointment for Idris to continue his post. a few days of confusion arose, more so when 22 other state assemblymen openly showing open support for Idris. Idris' eventual public apology was also a right move in this political gambit although what irks this writer is he said he does not know what he did wrong. Pak Lah approached the King again to seek his consent again and to see if a change of mind is possible. When royal consent was not given, Pak Lah did the next best thing and appointed the favored of the palace, Ahmad Said, in. whilst many will flay Pak Lah as a sign of weakness and possible future onslaughts by oppositions and internal political foes alike, i believe this is a wise move from Pak Lah to avert another potential explosive crisis for Barisan Nasional after their dismay showing in the elections.
There are already rumours floating about misappropriation of the Special Funds allocated to alleviate the hardcore poor and developments to this cause of which Idris' name was somehow indelibly linked together with some of his proponents in the assembly. Also, being the MB and advisor to the palace for a term, he should have known never to antagonised the Sultan. Afterall, in the Terengganu Malay heartland, loyalty to the sultan is unparalleled and never questioned. political parties comes and goes, but loyalty and love of the people for the ruler is unchallenged with the Sultan seen as the defender of religion and their way of life. that Idris' supporters went around with offensive banners with play of word "natang" (meaning "animal") targeted at palace officials demanding for Idris' reinstatement showed contempt. An attack on the palace is also an attack towards royalty! The Terengganu rakyat were incensed on these two counts. Idris' manner of apology also leave much to be desired. How could Idris' then said he is not sure what he did wrong? Surely, the Kelantan episode for the past two decades spoke volume about the influences of the palace. Idris does not deserve to be re-appointed again on that ground of contempt to the ruler and bad-taste "innocence" professed as far as this writer is concerned. His sincerity is being questioned.
An interesting note then is this new dilemma for the ruling coalition in this case. the unwritten understanding from the yesteryears is that an official is promoted under advise from Prime Minister is no longer the case with this precedent. the law states a person from a party that has the most support, confidence and backing of the legislatures is most suitable for the post. What we have today is blind and unquestioned appointment by federal level. However, Palace influence is no longer docile as they are used to. they are now a new force to be reckon with with their choice of "confidence" and "backing of the rakyat" against legislatures. With younger and more educated royalties now (this anak Perak is always proud of the fact that royalty from the Perak sultanate is of the highest academia linage) , they are indeed a "new"force to be reckon with. The Perlis Sultan's brother Syed Razlan Ibni Syed Putra Jamalullail even went into politics. Idris paid the price without a doubt for misreading the influence from the palace in his quest to please his federal bosses and not the rakyat! The current politicians and ruling coalitions would do well to add this dimension in their foray to the next election. Dilemma? I would rather see it as a new dawn in the political era. Daulat Tuanku!
The recent case with the new Menteri Besar (Chief Minister) of Terengganu was a real eye opener. Idris Jusoh, the former incumbent MB has won his state seat in the election. He was considered a shoo-in to retain his post then. But he has fell out of favor with both palace officials and the Sultan, also the current Constitutional King of Malaysia, on grounds that he has been rude and his followers disrespectful.
So this just added to Pak Lah's dilemma as he has already issued the letter of appointment for Idris to continue his post. a few days of confusion arose, more so when 22 other state assemblymen openly showing open support for Idris. Idris' eventual public apology was also a right move in this political gambit although what irks this writer is he said he does not know what he did wrong. Pak Lah approached the King again to seek his consent again and to see if a change of mind is possible. When royal consent was not given, Pak Lah did the next best thing and appointed the favored of the palace, Ahmad Said, in. whilst many will flay Pak Lah as a sign of weakness and possible future onslaughts by oppositions and internal political foes alike, i believe this is a wise move from Pak Lah to avert another potential explosive crisis for Barisan Nasional after their dismay showing in the elections.
There are already rumours floating about misappropriation of the Special Funds allocated to alleviate the hardcore poor and developments to this cause of which Idris' name was somehow indelibly linked together with some of his proponents in the assembly. Also, being the MB and advisor to the palace for a term, he should have known never to antagonised the Sultan. Afterall, in the Terengganu Malay heartland, loyalty to the sultan is unparalleled and never questioned. political parties comes and goes, but loyalty and love of the people for the ruler is unchallenged with the Sultan seen as the defender of religion and their way of life. that Idris' supporters went around with offensive banners with play of word "natang" (meaning "animal") targeted at palace officials demanding for Idris' reinstatement showed contempt. An attack on the palace is also an attack towards royalty! The Terengganu rakyat were incensed on these two counts. Idris' manner of apology also leave much to be desired. How could Idris' then said he is not sure what he did wrong? Surely, the Kelantan episode for the past two decades spoke volume about the influences of the palace. Idris does not deserve to be re-appointed again on that ground of contempt to the ruler and bad-taste "innocence" professed as far as this writer is concerned. His sincerity is being questioned.
An interesting note then is this new dilemma for the ruling coalition in this case. the unwritten understanding from the yesteryears is that an official is promoted under advise from Prime Minister is no longer the case with this precedent. the law states a person from a party that has the most support, confidence and backing of the legislatures is most suitable for the post. What we have today is blind and unquestioned appointment by federal level. However, Palace influence is no longer docile as they are used to. they are now a new force to be reckon with with their choice of "confidence" and "backing of the rakyat" against legislatures. With younger and more educated royalties now (this anak Perak is always proud of the fact that royalty from the Perak sultanate is of the highest academia linage) , they are indeed a "new"force to be reckon with. The Perlis Sultan's brother Syed Razlan Ibni Syed Putra Jamalullail even went into politics. Idris paid the price without a doubt for misreading the influence from the palace in his quest to please his federal bosses and not the rakyat! The current politicians and ruling coalitions would do well to add this dimension in their foray to the next election. Dilemma? I would rather see it as a new dawn in the political era. Daulat Tuanku!
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Uncommon sense
My say.....
As a frequent traveller both in KLIA main airport as well as LCCT, i note a certain glaring flaw with the ruling in checks. when one is passing the immigration scanner, we have the ruling that any form of liquid above 150ml are not permissible to be taken abroad. whilst i may appreciate the security concern of liquid based bombs such as onboard flights, it really defies logic that one can thereafter purchase mineral waters, sodas, lotions, minyak angin and what not after the checks at the immediate retail shops. And incidently, nitroglycerine, plutonium, hydrochloric acid and other heavy water is too volatile to carry manually.
so what is the purpose for being so stringent with the checks when immediately one can re-stock at the retail shops after the scanner machines? also, although one must appreciate the dedication of the officers in carrying out their duties, i think they are powerless in this matter with typical unclear directives. good area to improve then in the name of developing Pak Lah's notion of human capital. in some trifle case, some are carrying this enforcement too zealously without considering the feelings of our guests visiting Malaysia. wouldn't things like mineral or carbonated water clearly be harmless? granted that the checking officers are not chemist, but then again strictly applying such rules really confuses and unsettle the passengers deprived of their possessions. Sometimes seeing tourists argue with the enforcers over the cannister or drinking bottles confiscated is really disgusting. I am just waiting a day when the officers there have to confiscate someone's medicine or a baby bottles above 150ml in their over-zealousness to enforce rules. if the authorities are really adamant about it, then apply it across the airport. no retailing within the waiting lounge. in fact, water or any form of liquid should also not be served onboard flights. we know this is impossible in the name of commerce.
so while the officers blindly insists everyone discards their mineral waters, hot bottles, shampoos, lotions and creams; commerce still reigns unparallel in this glaring oversight. doesn't make sense is it? what has the airport authorities or the Home Ministry to say about it then?
As a frequent traveller both in KLIA main airport as well as LCCT, i note a certain glaring flaw with the ruling in checks. when one is passing the immigration scanner, we have the ruling that any form of liquid above 150ml are not permissible to be taken abroad. whilst i may appreciate the security concern of liquid based bombs such as onboard flights, it really defies logic that one can thereafter purchase mineral waters, sodas, lotions, minyak angin and what not after the checks at the immediate retail shops. And incidently, nitroglycerine, plutonium, hydrochloric acid and other heavy water is too volatile to carry manually.
so what is the purpose for being so stringent with the checks when immediately one can re-stock at the retail shops after the scanner machines? also, although one must appreciate the dedication of the officers in carrying out their duties, i think they are powerless in this matter with typical unclear directives. good area to improve then in the name of developing Pak Lah's notion of human capital. in some trifle case, some are carrying this enforcement too zealously without considering the feelings of our guests visiting Malaysia. wouldn't things like mineral or carbonated water clearly be harmless? granted that the checking officers are not chemist, but then again strictly applying such rules really confuses and unsettle the passengers deprived of their possessions. Sometimes seeing tourists argue with the enforcers over the cannister or drinking bottles confiscated is really disgusting. I am just waiting a day when the officers there have to confiscate someone's medicine or a baby bottles above 150ml in their over-zealousness to enforce rules. if the authorities are really adamant about it, then apply it across the airport. no retailing within the waiting lounge. in fact, water or any form of liquid should also not be served onboard flights. we know this is impossible in the name of commerce.
so while the officers blindly insists everyone discards their mineral waters, hot bottles, shampoos, lotions and creams; commerce still reigns unparallel in this glaring oversight. doesn't make sense is it? what has the airport authorities or the Home Ministry to say about it then?
Monday, March 24, 2008
Off-the-cuff mistakes
My say.....
as the new government settles in, it is good to recap some of the off-the-cuff comments that has irked many Malaysians alike. may this be a lesson for the 50% new faces in the cabinet to take note of it and improve.
firstly, my favorite. Hishamuddin Hussien in his warp guise of modern day Hang Tuah. Hang Tuah is the legendary warrior during the time of the Malay Sultanate in Malacca. He was famous because of his warrior capability, his dedication and loyalty to the Sultan and his patriotism to the state all culminated in his words that "no Malay will ever be obliterated in the face of the earth" (transliteral). it may be a fact Hishamuddin found inspiration and branded the Keris (malay dagger) and wanted to inspire the UMNO youth. the rest is history in that his speech is seen as a warning to other races not to challenge the might of the Malays. This drew flak from the non-bumiputeras as being careless for someone many acknowledged to be Prime Minister material in the not-too-distance future. He is since toned down his racial rhetorics and mended fences with the other races.
the case of two foolish MPs, Bung Mokhtar Radin and Mohd Said Yusof, who utilized the now infamous "bocor" (leaking) statement to a female MP, insensitively pointing towards menstruation. this slur came during heated exchange in parliament and were again nonchalantly attributed to misrepresentation of the printed media.
then another leader Roselan Juhar remarked that if a woman is being raped, she might as well lie down and enjoy it. no point fighting it being the weaker sex. this so-called leader deserved the highest condemnation. again, he defended himself stating its the fault of the media for misquoting him. the only thing the media didnt quote is he may be watching too much smut from the multimedia internet world that he got so much inspiration from.
the case of a lady MP Zahela Hussin who state that the stewardesses in AirAsia is dressed too provocatively in their body-hugging uniform. She observed they are not following Islamic values, when in fact the company is not owned by any Muslim cleric in the first place. for her information, AirAsia is a public company with an Indian Malaysian at the helm. And no, their uniform is not revealing and no stewardesses in their right mind would wear something exposing her private anatomy. Maybe just too much for this lady MP's husband preying eyes. The Malaysian Youth Council president Shamsul Anuar Nasarah has to learn to keep his comments to himself too!
then we have the case in 1999 where Siti Zaharah, acceded to other delegates during the customary UMNO winding up debates, who claimed that Petronas' original logo is liken to the opposition's Moon symbol. of course, 15 minutes of fame for those MP debaters and Petronas had to spend hundreds of thousands of Ringgit to re-do their logo involving more that 120 stations then. Money that could have better utilized elsewhere. someone has even snickered that we should not have gotten into the angkasawan project as it might just reflect support for DAP.
then we have Tun Mahathir Mohammed telling the Chinese he doesnt need their votes in his early political days. Pak Mahathir repeated it somewhat again at the height of economic prosperity in 1996 telling the Chinese to leave again if they protest his "marginalization" policies. few years later and after the crunching Asian financial crisis, our elder statesman did an about turn and told the bumiputera to learn the entrepreneurial and business value of the same Chinese he condemned. Maybe the press misquoted him too? Ali Rustam certainly learned very well from him during his address to PPP general assembly last year.
and finally, the UMNO youth once, prior to Operation Lalang in 1987, who once wanted to soak the keris with Chinese blood. If I am not mistaken, Najib Tun Razak was at the helm then. I will let you deduce that yourself.
It goes to show sometimes words are carelessly uttered by even the most seasoned of politicians. Words that are unable to be retracted when the press or other media gets hold of them. Don't blame all media reporters for your mistake. There is no way ten or fifteen plus reporters will get these particular messages wrong. Words that scars a multi racial society is best kept to their private nooks. What best time to check what MPs or politicians we have than now?! Malaysia has lost her age of innocence!
as the new government settles in, it is good to recap some of the off-the-cuff comments that has irked many Malaysians alike. may this be a lesson for the 50% new faces in the cabinet to take note of it and improve.
firstly, my favorite. Hishamuddin Hussien in his warp guise of modern day Hang Tuah. Hang Tuah is the legendary warrior during the time of the Malay Sultanate in Malacca. He was famous because of his warrior capability, his dedication and loyalty to the Sultan and his patriotism to the state all culminated in his words that "no Malay will ever be obliterated in the face of the earth" (transliteral). it may be a fact Hishamuddin found inspiration and branded the Keris (malay dagger) and wanted to inspire the UMNO youth. the rest is history in that his speech is seen as a warning to other races not to challenge the might of the Malays. This drew flak from the non-bumiputeras as being careless for someone many acknowledged to be Prime Minister material in the not-too-distance future. He is since toned down his racial rhetorics and mended fences with the other races.
the case of two foolish MPs, Bung Mokhtar Radin and Mohd Said Yusof, who utilized the now infamous "bocor" (leaking) statement to a female MP, insensitively pointing towards menstruation. this slur came during heated exchange in parliament and were again nonchalantly attributed to misrepresentation of the printed media.
then another leader Roselan Juhar remarked that if a woman is being raped, she might as well lie down and enjoy it. no point fighting it being the weaker sex. this so-called leader deserved the highest condemnation. again, he defended himself stating its the fault of the media for misquoting him. the only thing the media didnt quote is he may be watching too much smut from the multimedia internet world that he got so much inspiration from.
the case of a lady MP Zahela Hussin who state that the stewardesses in AirAsia is dressed too provocatively in their body-hugging uniform. She observed they are not following Islamic values, when in fact the company is not owned by any Muslim cleric in the first place. for her information, AirAsia is a public company with an Indian Malaysian at the helm. And no, their uniform is not revealing and no stewardesses in their right mind would wear something exposing her private anatomy. Maybe just too much for this lady MP's husband preying eyes. The Malaysian Youth Council president Shamsul Anuar Nasarah has to learn to keep his comments to himself too!
then we have the case in 1999 where Siti Zaharah, acceded to other delegates during the customary UMNO winding up debates, who claimed that Petronas' original logo is liken to the opposition's Moon symbol. of course, 15 minutes of fame for those MP debaters and Petronas had to spend hundreds of thousands of Ringgit to re-do their logo involving more that 120 stations then. Money that could have better utilized elsewhere. someone has even snickered that we should not have gotten into the angkasawan project as it might just reflect support for DAP.
then we have Tun Mahathir Mohammed telling the Chinese he doesnt need their votes in his early political days. Pak Mahathir repeated it somewhat again at the height of economic prosperity in 1996 telling the Chinese to leave again if they protest his "marginalization" policies. few years later and after the crunching Asian financial crisis, our elder statesman did an about turn and told the bumiputera to learn the entrepreneurial and business value of the same Chinese he condemned. Maybe the press misquoted him too? Ali Rustam certainly learned very well from him during his address to PPP general assembly last year.
and finally, the UMNO youth once, prior to Operation Lalang in 1987, who once wanted to soak the keris with Chinese blood. If I am not mistaken, Najib Tun Razak was at the helm then. I will let you deduce that yourself.
It goes to show sometimes words are carelessly uttered by even the most seasoned of politicians. Words that are unable to be retracted when the press or other media gets hold of them. Don't blame all media reporters for your mistake. There is no way ten or fifteen plus reporters will get these particular messages wrong. Words that scars a multi racial society is best kept to their private nooks. What best time to check what MPs or politicians we have than now?! Malaysia has lost her age of innocence!
Saturday, March 22, 2008
Sour Grapes
My say....
Pak Lah dropped the UMNO Wanita leader Rafidah Aziz from the cabinet. She had helmed the Ministry of International Trade and Industry for 21 years. That she was par excellence in that post is without a doubt. Rafidah is also still the current Wanita chief, a position she has made it her own bar one term. She is also know as "Queen of parliament" by the opposition. Little wonder then she is called the iron lady of politics. but the bombshell now is Rafidah refuses to leave quietly after the cabinet announcement.
She was expected to retain her cabinet position with considerable ease. but Pak Lah thought otherwise. High on the accusation was her handling of the Approved Permits to her favored few. AP permit is issued to import foreign vehicles to Malaysia. Another guess was she has overstayed and its time for a reform.
Whilst this writer believes it may not seem the best decision on Pak Lah's part, it is still the Prime Minister prerogative to choose his ministers in the Cabinet. Rafidah didn't think so. By sulking and leaving the Wanita wing to petition the PM for her re-appointment, it really showed the bitter side of her. even worse, it portrays she is still power-crazy! She even went on the offensive in the media against the popular Sharizat Abdul Jalil and Azalina Othman. One just wonder why the disciplinary committee led by Najib Razak is so quiet about it when proper channel is not used? In the media following the cabinet announcement, she accused Sharizat of backstabbing her, probably because Sharizat was appointed as special adviser to the PM on women affairs and Azalina as Tourism Minister. For Azalina, she questioned her legitimacy of being a Wanita member. Not surprising about the misgiving of Azalina from the Wanita wing as they are mostly filled by Rafidah's loyalists. And also said that the Wanita previous support and work were not appreciated was absolute rubbish. Top on the agenda of Pak Lah must be the top-heavy cabinet and perceived by the rakyat as absolute waste of funds and resources. Dr Aziz Bari, Professor in Law from International Islamic University thought so. Many from the Mahathir era had overstayed and voted out by the rakyat. Let it be known that the cabinet is not a gilt-edged post owed to any parties concerned. By right, the PM is supposed to choose capable ministers to the post, after mandate given by the rakyat. Undoubtedly, Rafidah won her seat but the writing is already in the wall. Don't forget, even her old mentor wants her out! Lobbying for rights to the posts in Cabinet even before the election by respective political parties, formed in the Alliance days of power sharing, are deemed irrevocable rights today. This recent malignant trend is worrisome. what more if the wings of other parties joins the fray for positions? Should Puteri UMNO and Puteri MIC leaders asks for ministerial posts tomorrow?
Less than 24 hours later after her attack, she did a 360 degree turnabout! all she could muster was her lame excuse that she is never vindictive and that she has more time with her grandchildren now. How pathetic! Maybe Malaysians in her perception are indeed gullible! After 30 years of, isn't it enough? She must remember no matter how good she is, that post does not belong to her alone. Nor is she irreplaceable. for how could she threaten by saying if she had known, she would not have run for the parliamentary seat? that she does a scintillating attacks in the media and left the damage at that without remorse really speaks volume of her character. Sour grapes? You bet!
Pak Lah dropped the UMNO Wanita leader Rafidah Aziz from the cabinet. She had helmed the Ministry of International Trade and Industry for 21 years. That she was par excellence in that post is without a doubt. Rafidah is also still the current Wanita chief, a position she has made it her own bar one term. She is also know as "Queen of parliament" by the opposition. Little wonder then she is called the iron lady of politics. but the bombshell now is Rafidah refuses to leave quietly after the cabinet announcement.
She was expected to retain her cabinet position with considerable ease. but Pak Lah thought otherwise. High on the accusation was her handling of the Approved Permits to her favored few. AP permit is issued to import foreign vehicles to Malaysia. Another guess was she has overstayed and its time for a reform.
Whilst this writer believes it may not seem the best decision on Pak Lah's part, it is still the Prime Minister prerogative to choose his ministers in the Cabinet. Rafidah didn't think so. By sulking and leaving the Wanita wing to petition the PM for her re-appointment, it really showed the bitter side of her. even worse, it portrays she is still power-crazy! She even went on the offensive in the media against the popular Sharizat Abdul Jalil and Azalina Othman. One just wonder why the disciplinary committee led by Najib Razak is so quiet about it when proper channel is not used? In the media following the cabinet announcement, she accused Sharizat of backstabbing her, probably because Sharizat was appointed as special adviser to the PM on women affairs and Azalina as Tourism Minister. For Azalina, she questioned her legitimacy of being a Wanita member. Not surprising about the misgiving of Azalina from the Wanita wing as they are mostly filled by Rafidah's loyalists. And also said that the Wanita previous support and work were not appreciated was absolute rubbish. Top on the agenda of Pak Lah must be the top-heavy cabinet and perceived by the rakyat as absolute waste of funds and resources. Dr Aziz Bari, Professor in Law from International Islamic University thought so. Many from the Mahathir era had overstayed and voted out by the rakyat. Let it be known that the cabinet is not a gilt-edged post owed to any parties concerned. By right, the PM is supposed to choose capable ministers to the post, after mandate given by the rakyat. Undoubtedly, Rafidah won her seat but the writing is already in the wall. Don't forget, even her old mentor wants her out! Lobbying for rights to the posts in Cabinet even before the election by respective political parties, formed in the Alliance days of power sharing, are deemed irrevocable rights today. This recent malignant trend is worrisome. what more if the wings of other parties joins the fray for positions? Should Puteri UMNO and Puteri MIC leaders asks for ministerial posts tomorrow?
Less than 24 hours later after her attack, she did a 360 degree turnabout! all she could muster was her lame excuse that she is never vindictive and that she has more time with her grandchildren now. How pathetic! Maybe Malaysians in her perception are indeed gullible! After 30 years of, isn't it enough? She must remember no matter how good she is, that post does not belong to her alone. Nor is she irreplaceable. for how could she threaten by saying if she had known, she would not have run for the parliamentary seat? that she does a scintillating attacks in the media and left the damage at that without remorse really speaks volume of her character. Sour grapes? You bet!
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Malaysia in perspective vis-a-vis Cambodia
My say....
A recent visit to the genocide museum in Phnom Penh, Cambodia showed the brutality of war and the aftermath of war in the wrong hand of a military despot. Pol Pot and his insidious Khmer Rouge regime cruelly killed an estimated 3 million people in the effort to dictate the royalty-aligned and peaceful Cambodians. They utilized their masked support for the King in an effort to capture the hearts of the people. When they have achieved that, they then systematically went on a killing spree of any potential threat to their rule. those who would even showed hint of challenging their might will be tortured and killed without mercy. it became so bad that even those who served as soldiers and courtiers are afraid of "disappearing at night". Forced marriages were enforced to moved potential grey Kampong folks against popular uprising. 99% divorce rate as a result after the end of their rule. Mental and literal torture were practiced everyday to ensure obedience. Portrait pictures that i have of innocent babies being bludgeoned to death still sears my mind.
We have just concluded our General Election and the rakyat have spoken. In saying so, it is good that sometimes those who have lost their stake as candidates or their supporters do not resort to lies, poison letters, political scams and cheating for vengeance. This is to both supporters of government and the opposition. Cambodia's lesson was evident that the people forget to count their blessings and paid the price of suffering under Pol Pot's regime. The signs of hatred and jealousy are indeed at work here if we care to look closely. Some of the blogs and hearsays heard are simply pure lies and malice. We must always remember that in all that we do, let not a peaceful and harmonious country like ours be the ultimate loser. We do not need a police state nor a country where everyone lives in fear. We have chased away many investors, businesses and even tourists through apathies. what's next then? we turn inwards and destroy ourselves in the name of indifference and jealousy? It is a good sign that the current government under Barisan Nasional is gracious even in losing the few states. That they make way for the opposition to take over augurs well to a healthy democracy at work. Let's hope the federal side do not withhold any aids against the opposition led state governments in spite.
On my flight back from Phnom Penh, I am thankful that Malaysia is governed well. Yes, Malaysia is indeed special and unique where one can still sit at our beloved mamak stall among friends without fear. We have established now a government that is chosen by the people for the people. it is never easy appeasing all the various communities. Kudoes to the Barisan Nasional-led government and now with the new cabinet in place, it is time to work and to mend fences created in the political tussles. I pray the lessons witnessed in the genocide museum will never reach the shores of Malaysia, ever.
A recent visit to the genocide museum in Phnom Penh, Cambodia showed the brutality of war and the aftermath of war in the wrong hand of a military despot. Pol Pot and his insidious Khmer Rouge regime cruelly killed an estimated 3 million people in the effort to dictate the royalty-aligned and peaceful Cambodians. They utilized their masked support for the King in an effort to capture the hearts of the people. When they have achieved that, they then systematically went on a killing spree of any potential threat to their rule. those who would even showed hint of challenging their might will be tortured and killed without mercy. it became so bad that even those who served as soldiers and courtiers are afraid of "disappearing at night". Forced marriages were enforced to moved potential grey Kampong folks against popular uprising. 99% divorce rate as a result after the end of their rule. Mental and literal torture were practiced everyday to ensure obedience. Portrait pictures that i have of innocent babies being bludgeoned to death still sears my mind.
We have just concluded our General Election and the rakyat have spoken. In saying so, it is good that sometimes those who have lost their stake as candidates or their supporters do not resort to lies, poison letters, political scams and cheating for vengeance. This is to both supporters of government and the opposition. Cambodia's lesson was evident that the people forget to count their blessings and paid the price of suffering under Pol Pot's regime. The signs of hatred and jealousy are indeed at work here if we care to look closely. Some of the blogs and hearsays heard are simply pure lies and malice. We must always remember that in all that we do, let not a peaceful and harmonious country like ours be the ultimate loser. We do not need a police state nor a country where everyone lives in fear. We have chased away many investors, businesses and even tourists through apathies. what's next then? we turn inwards and destroy ourselves in the name of indifference and jealousy? It is a good sign that the current government under Barisan Nasional is gracious even in losing the few states. That they make way for the opposition to take over augurs well to a healthy democracy at work. Let's hope the federal side do not withhold any aids against the opposition led state governments in spite.
On my flight back from Phnom Penh, I am thankful that Malaysia is governed well. Yes, Malaysia is indeed special and unique where one can still sit at our beloved mamak stall among friends without fear. We have established now a government that is chosen by the people for the people. it is never easy appeasing all the various communities. Kudoes to the Barisan Nasional-led government and now with the new cabinet in place, it is time to work and to mend fences created in the political tussles. I pray the lessons witnessed in the genocide museum will never reach the shores of Malaysia, ever.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Husam Musa
My say.....
the election really is an eye opener of sorts to many. this is an opportunity for the rakyat to see their elected representative up close and to really interact on first hand basis.
Husam Musa, the vice president of PAS to me seems to be an excellent guy. Down to earth, moderate and to some extent elequont, he has won admiration in both with the muslims and non-muslims around him. never one to blow his trumpet, he carries himself very well both in public and private life. having watched him for a while since his entry into the political limelight, he always seems to have done his homework before carrying it to debate and not mere rhetorics and hearsays. never accusative in his choice of words, what i like is he always argues from facts and figures, something rare in Malaysia's politics today. his style certainly brings a refreshing change from the cacophonies and hallow outbursts we hear time and again from other MPs in parliament.
its a pity then that he is with the ultra-orthodox Islamic party such as PAS in this writer's opinion. He should be with a multi-racial party, and what a bright shining star he would be in the political circle. In political circles, he is deemed "clean" and without any racial overtones even when with PAS. I could really imagine Husam leading a multi racial party, not unlike what Onn Jaafar had in mind when he left UMNO. He would certainly shine brighter than the controversial and opportunistic Anwar Ibrahim anytime. then the country will really be given hope of a real opposition and, who knows, maybe the government one day.
and no, this writer was not paid by anyone to lure a political star in the making to any other camp. I am impressed with Husam.
the election really is an eye opener of sorts to many. this is an opportunity for the rakyat to see their elected representative up close and to really interact on first hand basis.
Husam Musa, the vice president of PAS to me seems to be an excellent guy. Down to earth, moderate and to some extent elequont, he has won admiration in both with the muslims and non-muslims around him. never one to blow his trumpet, he carries himself very well both in public and private life. having watched him for a while since his entry into the political limelight, he always seems to have done his homework before carrying it to debate and not mere rhetorics and hearsays. never accusative in his choice of words, what i like is he always argues from facts and figures, something rare in Malaysia's politics today. his style certainly brings a refreshing change from the cacophonies and hallow outbursts we hear time and again from other MPs in parliament.
its a pity then that he is with the ultra-orthodox Islamic party such as PAS in this writer's opinion. He should be with a multi-racial party, and what a bright shining star he would be in the political circle. In political circles, he is deemed "clean" and without any racial overtones even when with PAS. I could really imagine Husam leading a multi racial party, not unlike what Onn Jaafar had in mind when he left UMNO. He would certainly shine brighter than the controversial and opportunistic Anwar Ibrahim anytime. then the country will really be given hope of a real opposition and, who knows, maybe the government one day.
and no, this writer was not paid by anyone to lure a political star in the making to any other camp. I am impressed with Husam.
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Post Mortem readout!
My say....
The winds of change in the 12th General Election says it all. post mortem is now being conducted how Barisan Nasional could lose with such enormity and unpredictability. don't they know never to rest on their laurels?
these are the views i gathered if it may help offer to shed some light to the Tsunami effect:
1) arrogance from the part of the leaders. Samy Vellu said even if Anwar Ibrahim came to Sungai Siput, he will still win with handsome majority. instead he was pushed out by a political unknown. Barisan said they will take back Kelantan. instead PAS got firmer grip on the state. Umno even had Menteri Besar designated to Kelantan when it had not won. Gerakan played Chief Minister musical chairs with the three hopefuls when election was around the corner. not surprisingly, the musical man and his three hopefuls were kicked out.
2) off the cuff remarks and actions. Hishamuddin and his Keris wielding rhetorics scored points in the Umno general assembly, but was insensitive to the other feelings of the multi racial rakyat. prior to that, we have Umno youths threatened to burn down the chinese commerce chamber before, which hardly speaks of maturity or qualification to be leaders. and Pak Lah telling the press no election yet, and then do the very opposite all in the same day. that his explanation of unable to get audience with the Agong only serves to patronize the rakyat. the rakyat don't find that funny nor forget easily.
3) Hypocrisy. people are seen to be bearing the burden whereas the those affiliated to the ruling parties are getting handsome slices of projects and contracts. how could Najib tell the rakyat to change their lifestyle when it seems the politicians themselves are not?
4) whilst economic plans are put in place, like the Economic corridors, yet it is not benefiting the masses. and people are also worried that the economic plans by Pak Lah may be even more grandiose than that of his predecessor. the subsidies removed and taken to capitalized the corridors plans are seen to be benefiting only some cronies of the government, it should have been utilized to elevate the misery of rakyat first from inflation. that's the perception of the people.
5) security in country is still lax. with the police getting their increase in salary, yet there was really no improvement in the end. police patrolling the streets doesn't seems to increase except for few excerpts from newspaper, which is viewed as propaganda tools for the government. Fear are abounding still in many places. ask sharlinie's parents or those mugged in the streets on daily basis. rape, disappearance and even few high profile fatal shooting cases shows something drastically wrong in the Police handling of the country's security.
6) infighting and indiscipline. many are speculating that Ong Ka Ting did not hold to the gentleman's agreement to let go of the reign in MCA as agreed between Mahathir, Ling Liong Sik and Lim Ah Lek much to the disgust of Chan Kong Choy and supporters. no surprise then he announced his withdrawal as candidate in the eve of election. grouses were heard from the grassroots. the Perlis fiasco, where three UMNO big-guns all claiming to have PM's ear in their bid to oust each other. Perlis is not the PM's personal fiefdom mind you. even more disgusting was videotaping of Chua Soi Lek and his nonsense. definitely done by internal political foes. Even Mahathir still holds considerable influence, and he asked for stronger opposition voice in parliament. still resentful Pak Lah ignoring him? Baffling! then we have Kayveas courting Gerakan for merger. He asked to wait for the death of one of the founding member of Gerakan he did not liked before the merger could go ahead. childish quarrelling resulted with headlines in major newspapers.
7) and the government's ever useful ISA is feared to be abused eventually. Hindraf and Bersih were tip of the iceberg. Barisan should have then picked up pointers from it. but then it went and arrest the protestors under ISA. not in tune with the rakyat's grouses and suffering. the rakyat was incensed with the high handed treatment when the leaders of the rally already said it was a peaceful demonstration. top of their agenda then were Hindu temples being demolished.why arrest them when the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and now they having their holy place not only desecrated but demolished? are we also turning to be a police state that Mahathir claimed? Islamic state is bad enough already, scaring away investors! then we have Khairy shooting off his mouth in the Youth assembly not unlike a thug to quash opponents in street brawl if needed. yes, its normal Youth rhetorics to show Ketuanan Melayu fervency and sublime warning against future challenging of this Ketuanan Melayu, but it has worn-out its effectiveness with media savvy Malaysians.
8) the release of Lingamgate video how a lawyer brokering appointment of judges also undermined already whatever faith left the people have of a fair system. no thanks to Anwar indeed who was part of the system then, but then, that's politics. yes it was during Mahathir's tenure, but then its still Barisan in charge. leave the Constitution and the rule of Law alone!
9) unfair coverage. that the opposition was never given fair coverage. at least have the courtesy to extend media coverage, not unlike the US debates. the rakyat can then assess the potential of the candidate. the thrust of Bersih when they demanded for a clean election. the fact that the rakyat demanded Parliament coverage goes to show they want to know what is happening in the august House. this is only shown in part with heavy editing. how can one trust the media, more so the election campaigning then?
10) most important, basic essential prices. its bread and butter issue at the end of the day. yes, the global oil prices are high, but then its failure is not explaining enough to the rakyat. that the opposition could just walk in and capitalized it with empty promises they dont have to fulfill is clear. such weak attempt to brush off the opposition's claims on this issue only compounded problem. the perception that the government is non-committal to helping ease suffering of the people was reinforced. there is also an uneasiness that the government will continue to raise petroleum price after the election. Maybe the Administration of Pak Lah has yet to grasp what Mahathir knew all along: the purchasing power of our earnings and payroll. in that sense, Mahathir got it right, brilliant guy that he is!
Verdict : its basically a protest vote and a strong reminder for the government not to take things for granted even after a handsome 92% margin victory is the previous election. no fools will believe the opposition's claim of welfare state giving RM6000 each month to each individual. its rubbish if opposition thinks they won on merit. to the current government, time to win back the trust and get the house in order, pronto!
The winds of change in the 12th General Election says it all. post mortem is now being conducted how Barisan Nasional could lose with such enormity and unpredictability. don't they know never to rest on their laurels?
these are the views i gathered if it may help offer to shed some light to the Tsunami effect:
1) arrogance from the part of the leaders. Samy Vellu said even if Anwar Ibrahim came to Sungai Siput, he will still win with handsome majority. instead he was pushed out by a political unknown. Barisan said they will take back Kelantan. instead PAS got firmer grip on the state. Umno even had Menteri Besar designated to Kelantan when it had not won. Gerakan played Chief Minister musical chairs with the three hopefuls when election was around the corner. not surprisingly, the musical man and his three hopefuls were kicked out.
2) off the cuff remarks and actions. Hishamuddin and his Keris wielding rhetorics scored points in the Umno general assembly, but was insensitive to the other feelings of the multi racial rakyat. prior to that, we have Umno youths threatened to burn down the chinese commerce chamber before, which hardly speaks of maturity or qualification to be leaders. and Pak Lah telling the press no election yet, and then do the very opposite all in the same day. that his explanation of unable to get audience with the Agong only serves to patronize the rakyat. the rakyat don't find that funny nor forget easily.
3) Hypocrisy. people are seen to be bearing the burden whereas the those affiliated to the ruling parties are getting handsome slices of projects and contracts. how could Najib tell the rakyat to change their lifestyle when it seems the politicians themselves are not?
4) whilst economic plans are put in place, like the Economic corridors, yet it is not benefiting the masses. and people are also worried that the economic plans by Pak Lah may be even more grandiose than that of his predecessor. the subsidies removed and taken to capitalized the corridors plans are seen to be benefiting only some cronies of the government, it should have been utilized to elevate the misery of rakyat first from inflation. that's the perception of the people.
5) security in country is still lax. with the police getting their increase in salary, yet there was really no improvement in the end. police patrolling the streets doesn't seems to increase except for few excerpts from newspaper, which is viewed as propaganda tools for the government. Fear are abounding still in many places. ask sharlinie's parents or those mugged in the streets on daily basis. rape, disappearance and even few high profile fatal shooting cases shows something drastically wrong in the Police handling of the country's security.
6) infighting and indiscipline. many are speculating that Ong Ka Ting did not hold to the gentleman's agreement to let go of the reign in MCA as agreed between Mahathir, Ling Liong Sik and Lim Ah Lek much to the disgust of Chan Kong Choy and supporters. no surprise then he announced his withdrawal as candidate in the eve of election. grouses were heard from the grassroots. the Perlis fiasco, where three UMNO big-guns all claiming to have PM's ear in their bid to oust each other. Perlis is not the PM's personal fiefdom mind you. even more disgusting was videotaping of Chua Soi Lek and his nonsense. definitely done by internal political foes. Even Mahathir still holds considerable influence, and he asked for stronger opposition voice in parliament. still resentful Pak Lah ignoring him? Baffling! then we have Kayveas courting Gerakan for merger. He asked to wait for the death of one of the founding member of Gerakan he did not liked before the merger could go ahead. childish quarrelling resulted with headlines in major newspapers.
7) and the government's ever useful ISA is feared to be abused eventually. Hindraf and Bersih were tip of the iceberg. Barisan should have then picked up pointers from it. but then it went and arrest the protestors under ISA. not in tune with the rakyat's grouses and suffering. the rakyat was incensed with the high handed treatment when the leaders of the rally already said it was a peaceful demonstration. top of their agenda then were Hindu temples being demolished.why arrest them when the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and now they having their holy place not only desecrated but demolished? are we also turning to be a police state that Mahathir claimed? Islamic state is bad enough already, scaring away investors! then we have Khairy shooting off his mouth in the Youth assembly not unlike a thug to quash opponents in street brawl if needed. yes, its normal Youth rhetorics to show Ketuanan Melayu fervency and sublime warning against future challenging of this Ketuanan Melayu, but it has worn-out its effectiveness with media savvy Malaysians.
8) the release of Lingamgate video how a lawyer brokering appointment of judges also undermined already whatever faith left the people have of a fair system. no thanks to Anwar indeed who was part of the system then, but then, that's politics. yes it was during Mahathir's tenure, but then its still Barisan in charge. leave the Constitution and the rule of Law alone!
9) unfair coverage. that the opposition was never given fair coverage. at least have the courtesy to extend media coverage, not unlike the US debates. the rakyat can then assess the potential of the candidate. the thrust of Bersih when they demanded for a clean election. the fact that the rakyat demanded Parliament coverage goes to show they want to know what is happening in the august House. this is only shown in part with heavy editing. how can one trust the media, more so the election campaigning then?
10) most important, basic essential prices. its bread and butter issue at the end of the day. yes, the global oil prices are high, but then its failure is not explaining enough to the rakyat. that the opposition could just walk in and capitalized it with empty promises they dont have to fulfill is clear. such weak attempt to brush off the opposition's claims on this issue only compounded problem. the perception that the government is non-committal to helping ease suffering of the people was reinforced. there is also an uneasiness that the government will continue to raise petroleum price after the election. Maybe the Administration of Pak Lah has yet to grasp what Mahathir knew all along: the purchasing power of our earnings and payroll. in that sense, Mahathir got it right, brilliant guy that he is!
Verdict : its basically a protest vote and a strong reminder for the government not to take things for granted even after a handsome 92% margin victory is the previous election. no fools will believe the opposition's claim of welfare state giving RM6000 each month to each individual. its rubbish if opposition thinks they won on merit. to the current government, time to win back the trust and get the house in order, pronto!
Democracy alive in Malaysia's General Election
My say....
It is final curtains for some overstayed politicians like Samy Vellu, Aziz Shamsuddin and M. Kayveas, who as taken their positions for granted. the lesson for all to learn is never overstay your welcome. although to the victors goes the spoils, yet it must go on record that they have put in significant amount of energy in their ministerial capacity then. happy retiring from politics.... or so we hope! I am still waiting for Samy to come back as a Senator as spoken to a confidant!
Whilst i may symphatised with hardworking politicians like Koh Tsu Koon, Sharizat Abdul Jalil, Donald Lim, G. Palanivel and Chew Mei Fun who still has much to give, it goes back to the people's verdict of how the previous government is seen as failing to rectify their mistakes and heed the rakyat's grouses. They must listen!
whatever it is, let's move forward for all politicians concerned, both new ruling government and opposition. its time to make good the position and trust given to you by the rakyat. whatever the case, democracy won at the end of the day!
Monday, March 3, 2008
PKR strategy indifference
My say...
when the news that Nurul Izzah Anwar, aged 28, was the candidate to take on Sharizat Abdul Jalil in Lembah Pantai constituency, my immediate response was that Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) is bankrupt of ideas. PKR can even be seen as just getting into the election to patronize Lembah Pantai voters. They are playing politics and indeed insulting the intelligence of voters there.
why? first it boils down to indifference towards the feelings of the voters. for how could Nurul Izzah help the constituent if she wins? secondly, why would PKR wants to force out a hard working minister in Sharizat, should and if Nurul Izzah wins? thirdly, forcing the voters to choose between rational over emotional matters, for both sets of voters really leave bad taste. PKR's action by putting Nurul Izzah is tantamount of toying with voters to choose popularity/symphathy for Anwar over development to one of the most develop area of Klang Valley. Would PKR be content if Lembah Pantai be in the doldrum if Nurul Izzah wins at the expense of the constituent?
I have no quarrel with PKR, but its choice, decision and indifference in getting into voters' confidence leaves a lot to be desired! My vote certainly goes against it!
when the news that Nurul Izzah Anwar, aged 28, was the candidate to take on Sharizat Abdul Jalil in Lembah Pantai constituency, my immediate response was that Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) is bankrupt of ideas. PKR can even be seen as just getting into the election to patronize Lembah Pantai voters. They are playing politics and indeed insulting the intelligence of voters there.
why? first it boils down to indifference towards the feelings of the voters. for how could Nurul Izzah help the constituent if she wins? secondly, why would PKR wants to force out a hard working minister in Sharizat, should and if Nurul Izzah wins? thirdly, forcing the voters to choose between rational over emotional matters, for both sets of voters really leave bad taste. PKR's action by putting Nurul Izzah is tantamount of toying with voters to choose popularity/symphathy for Anwar over development to one of the most develop area of Klang Valley. Would PKR be content if Lembah Pantai be in the doldrum if Nurul Izzah wins at the expense of the constituent?
I have no quarrel with PKR, but its choice, decision and indifference in getting into voters' confidence leaves a lot to be desired! My vote certainly goes against it!
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Is a free Anti corruption Agency possible?
My say.....
the recent Lingam saga recently shocked the nation. it involves the Judicial, the Legislative and the Executive in the whole scheme of things. a series of power brokering involving Lingam, purportedly on behalf of the Executive, to appoint judges and even to influence cases to their advantage. And Lingam is just a lawyer albeit well connected. Lingam's secretary testified to the Royal Commission of Inquiry that the Anti Corruption Agency (ACA) bribed her to withdraw any charges as many high profile people are involved. the sickening part is the very agency to check corruptions is committing the very crime it is against. this smack right into abuse to their profession and blatant disregard of the office. we can see that the separation of power between the Judicial, the Legislative and the Executive no longer exist and even worse, manipulated. Absolute power corrupts absolutely!
that the ACA was deemed to be a neutral agency is diminished in the eyes of the rakyat. for how can it be a neutral office when it comes under the purview of the Prime Minister's office in the first place? how can the ACA conduct checks on assets held by the Legislatives or Members of Parliament (translated: supporters) of the Executive? what if the Prime Minister himself is corrupt and abuses the position? Remember, even Lee Kuan Yew once worried about President of Singapore abusing power with regards to their Treasury reserves. will the ACA then be capable to arrest their "boss"? Yes, it does arrest the few minions of the Executive, but not the "big fishes". How will that win respect of the people? the Lingam saga confirmed now that ACA in Malaysia is nothing but a tool for the Executive. This is reality and this has certainly affected the confidence in the government!
It is high time that the ACA be given back its soul. it must come under the a respected autonomous body away from the PM's office. why? because it has lost its purpose there! a newly appointed Royal Commission against Corruption should be heading it. Let good men lead it, like the honourable Lee Lam Thye or the respected Shahrir Abdul Samad when he retires as MP for Johor Bahru.Hong Kong's famous Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) is a good model to follow although i know it reports directly to the Chief Executive of Hong Kong. let the Royal Commission against Corruption be answerable directly to Parliament. it is better if its findings and reports go there, to the ruling parties and oppositions alike. confidence must be restored.
the recent Lingam saga recently shocked the nation. it involves the Judicial, the Legislative and the Executive in the whole scheme of things. a series of power brokering involving Lingam, purportedly on behalf of the Executive, to appoint judges and even to influence cases to their advantage. And Lingam is just a lawyer albeit well connected. Lingam's secretary testified to the Royal Commission of Inquiry that the Anti Corruption Agency (ACA) bribed her to withdraw any charges as many high profile people are involved. the sickening part is the very agency to check corruptions is committing the very crime it is against. this smack right into abuse to their profession and blatant disregard of the office. we can see that the separation of power between the Judicial, the Legislative and the Executive no longer exist and even worse, manipulated. Absolute power corrupts absolutely!
that the ACA was deemed to be a neutral agency is diminished in the eyes of the rakyat. for how can it be a neutral office when it comes under the purview of the Prime Minister's office in the first place? how can the ACA conduct checks on assets held by the Legislatives or Members of Parliament (translated: supporters) of the Executive? what if the Prime Minister himself is corrupt and abuses the position? Remember, even Lee Kuan Yew once worried about President of Singapore abusing power with regards to their Treasury reserves. will the ACA then be capable to arrest their "boss"? Yes, it does arrest the few minions of the Executive, but not the "big fishes". How will that win respect of the people? the Lingam saga confirmed now that ACA in Malaysia is nothing but a tool for the Executive. This is reality and this has certainly affected the confidence in the government!
It is high time that the ACA be given back its soul. it must come under the a respected autonomous body away from the PM's office. why? because it has lost its purpose there! a newly appointed Royal Commission against Corruption should be heading it. Let good men lead it, like the honourable Lee Lam Thye or the respected Shahrir Abdul Samad when he retires as MP for Johor Bahru.Hong Kong's famous Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) is a good model to follow although i know it reports directly to the Chief Executive of Hong Kong. let the Royal Commission against Corruption be answerable directly to Parliament. it is better if its findings and reports go there, to the ruling parties and oppositions alike. confidence must be restored.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)